Cubs’ PR Nightmare Continues as Joe Ricketts’ Bigoted Emails Surface

Just about everyone has a relative whose worldview is deeply flawed and who believes just about everything they see on Facebook. They forward conspiracy-theory emails that are clearly debunked by five seconds of critical thinking, they share all manner of [insert protected group]-phobic memes and jokes, and they will tell you the world is just too damn PC if you attempt to chastise them or even gently prod them to address their ignorance.

Maybe it’s your uncle or your grandma, a cousin, someone who doesn’t know any better and whose activity probably won’t blow back on you. But it’s a different story when said sharer of bigoted information is the patriarch of the Cubs’ ownership group, Joe Ricketts. And though the family quickly went on the defensive in an attempt to distance their father from the organization, an earlier email dump makes that somewhat difficult.

This latest round of idiocy came via Splinter, the same publication that has previously shared emails detailing the Ricketts family’s highly coordinated corporate structure in a series called “The Billionaire’s Inbox. As expected, Tom Ricketts leaped into traffic with a statement released to The Athletic [free] through a spokesperson Monday evening.

We are aware of the racially insensitive emails in my father’s account that were published by an online media outlet. Let me be clear: The language and views expressed in those emails have no place in our society.

My father is not involved with the operation of the Chicago Cubs in any way. I am trusted with representing this organization and our fans with a respect for people from all backgrounds. These emails do not reflect the culture we’ve worked so hard to build at the Chicago Cubs since 2009.

Okay, so this is actually better than what we’ve gotten so far from the Ricketts family in a winter that has included a series of PR snafus. Maybe Cubs ownership has finally woken up after repeatedly hitting snooze and hoping the nightmare will simply end peacefully. After all, they’ve had multiple opportunities to change the course of the narrative and they’ve actively chosen to let things run on relatively untouched.

Whether it’s their financial situation, Addison Russell’s continued employment, or the increasing publicity of the family’s political ties, this hasn’t been a great run. With full understanding that a significant percentage of Cubs fans will never care about most of these issues, if they’re ever even cognizant of them in the first place, the culture Ricketts mentioned above will erode quickly if the current course is maintained.

Listen, it’s naive to think billionaires aren’t out there figuring out ways to maintain and multiply their vast wealth. The emails linked above prove that’s the case for the Ricketts family, and we’d know that to be true even if we didn’t have proof. One of the best ways to grow that money is via political donations, championing those candidates and causes that can best help you. But that stuff usually takes place behind closed doors.

The Ricketts family, however, is openly engaging in battle with Alderman Tom Tunney of the 44th Ward, even going so far as to host de facto political ads on local radio and at Cubs Convention. Todd Ricketts, who is heavily rumored to be eyeing a run at the Illinois governor’s seat in the next election, was recently appointed to run the fundraising for Donald Trump’s presidential re-election. More than just failing to separate politics from their business, the Ricketts family is embracing their political interests like they did “the target” in 2016.

And this isn’t even getting into the implications of potentially partnering with Sinclair, a broadcast outfit known for handing out must-read propaganda to its local news stations. This isn’t about which way the family leans, it’s that the Ricketts appear to be perfectly content to lean right into the headwind of bad publicity with the thought that their baseball team shields them from the slings and arrows that come with the territory.

They’ve assumed that by cultivating this collective everyman persona, they can get the same forgiveness afforded Curt Schilling’s niece or nephew. That may have even worked had so many other issues not left the Ricketts siblings too inextricably linked to their father for any sort of semantic excision to remove all traces of his involvement. Which is perhaps why daddy dearest put out a brief statement of his own via his personal website.

I deeply regret and apologize for some of the exchanges I had in my emails. Sometimes I received emails that I should have condemned. Other times I’ve said things that don’t reflect my value system. I strongly believe that bigoted ideas are wrong.

This may be very sincere or it may simply be one of those deals in which he’s really just sorry he got caught. My initial assessment is that it’s the former, but I’m not going to pretend I know the elder Ricketts enough outside of his email dialogue to say he doesn’t actually feel any earnest contrition. Either way, having anything like this to apologize for in the first place is a bad look.

I’m not entirely sure where I’m going with this right now, only that I had to commit some thoughts to the page. It’s possible this stuff just blows over and ends up as nothing but an ugly footnote in Cubs history, but this feels more like a scab that people are going to keep picking at. Unless the Ricketts are diligent about addressing and fixing what’s gone wrong, these things are going to continue to crop up and the situation will eventually become too big to walk away from. Some believe it already has.

So as the analytics guys search for the the next great metric on the field, I guess we’ll find out whether the Cubs can offer some definitive proof about how their spin rate leads to whiffs.

Related Articles


  1. Let’s face it. The billionaires who own sports teams mostly lean right. The same can probably be said for millionaire athletes. Most keep their politics and donations to themselves. The Ricketts haven’t been able or willing to do that.

    That said, I’ll continue to base my sports fandom on what’s going on on the field, not in the voting booth.

    My politics are another matter, but that’s not for discussion in this forum.

    1. I agree. I also wonder if the Ricketts bunch wasn’t fighting Tunney, if this trove of garbage would have been sought out or published. Tunney has taken the blackeyes in the past and seems to love to pick a fight with the biggest cash cow in his neighborhood, for no reason other than the ones that line his pockets. Now, he can point the finger at Conservative Joe and distract from the cesspool politics, moral decay and mountain of debt that is Chicago.

  2. Who cares, let’s play ball. As long as they don’t force me to listen to them and they field a competitive team, it doesn’t matter to me.

  3. So here’s the deal with Sinclair and all the other broadcasting conglomerates. Nearly all, and I mean some that would shock you, lean hard right. But hard left sells. And it’s not just the executives. It filters all the way down to on air personalities. They talk left and vote right.

    People need to throw away their idealistic notions that integrity exists in real time news and in the hearts of the people they look up to. It doesn’t, and it’s a sad state of affairs.

    I was so disenfranchised with that aspect of broadcasting while I pursued it. The thought that broadcasting platforms could ever run their businesses with open minds, enlarged hearts, and receptive souls is farcical. At the end of the day it’s all about the revenues.

      1. I look for outlets that simply report the news. And I live by one rule. If you see a sensationalized headline, you can bet your ass the content is 100x more sensationalized. We live in a cycle of hot takes and uneducated opinion. Sadly.

        1. My favorite source for current event reading is realclearpolitics. I think it is always helpful to understand the basis of the arguments for both sides. There are even times I agree with the lefts argument. 🙂

  4. “My father is not involved with the operation of the Chicago Cubs in any way.”

    Meh. Carefully chosen use of the word “operation.” Sure, Joe has no involvement in the day-to-day decision making of running a baseball business. But he is the president of the corporation that operates the family trust that owns the LLC that owns the Cubs. So the bottom line is: Joe is ultimately in control of the $$$.

  5. Is it a big distraction to how the club is handling its offseason signings? Yes . Does it let Theo/Jed off the hook for awhile? Yes . Is. there a correlation? Maybe.

    1. Are you insinuating that the Cubs may have prompted the release of Joe’s emails in order to take heat off the front office?

      1. Evan,
        That was not my intent. However, this is among the strangest offseasons Ive ever seen in 45 + years of following the Cubs.
        Nothing would surprise me though, and it suddenly seems
        acceptable to air your dirty laundry in public. No one bats an eye or is rarely shocked by anything anymore due to way our
        culture has evolved.

  6. Joe’s only regret is you found the emails. Todd works for the Republican Party. The whole thing is disgusting. It’s very hard to be a Cubs fan these days.

  7. Funny how suddenly all bigotry is thought to dominate only one ideology(or race), based on what I’ve read here. History proves otherwise, especially based on what I observed as far back as 50 years ago in the western suburbs. More recently, certain peoples’ conduct hasn’t exactly “helped” their cause, fake news aside. This is when all the other “self righteous” (usually younger) “perfect” people have plenty to say, especially now that there are more phone based, “social avenues” in which a person can be expressive. Not much has changed (especially in Chicago), so please get over yourselves.

    1. Unless you’re willing to actually say the quiet part out loud, it’s probably best to remain completely silent. There’s this common theme running through the criticism of people who are intolerant of racism, which you’ve continued by calling those folks “self righteous” and “perfect.” Among the many flaws there is that calling someone a bigot is in any way calling oneself perfect. At no point have I said as much about myself, nor have I ever encountered anyone else who has referred to themselves as perfect.

      But if you’re going to do the air-quote thing and sort of talk around the issue, you’re really not doing anything to bring clarity to your point. If you’re saying what it sounds like you’re saying, and keep in mind this is just my perception, you may be a little upset about having your own views called into question.

      1. In a nutshell, the more things “change”, the more they stay the same. I believe Jesse Lee Peterson said it best when he said racism is simply another form of evil. It’s not so much that I’m not intolerant of racism, since I’m quite familiar with it during my “interactions” with some (not all) policemen, growing up on the south side during the ’60s, but there’s no chance of a “cure” until we repent and obey God’s Laws; something I get the impression most seem loathe to hear today. The “self righteous” to whom I was referring were those who share the same skin color as I (based on your photo, I assume that we don’t share that in common, lol), but wish to use their “outrage” as an excuse to conduct themselves immorally. I’ve seen enough to know that whatever is being done (especially in Chicago, but the nation as a whole) without God as the Guide, simply isn’t going to cure what ails us. Sorry if I offended you. That wasn’t my intent. I should’ve simply stated that from the beginning, instead of responding sarcastically.

  8. Pingback: 바카라
  9. Pingback: 7lab pharma labs
  10. Pingback: la replica watches

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button