Game 163 Was a Team Loss, but Joe Maddon Made 3 Costly Errors

If anyone is looking for a takeaway from Monday’s loss of the division title, it’s that we can firmly say Joe Maddon is in full postseason form. Unfortunately, that’s not completely good for Cubs fans.

Several things beyond Maddon’s control certainly went wrong in the Game 163 defeat to the Milwaukee Brewers. The offense was again predictably weak against Joulys Chacin. The Brewers’ big bullpen arms took advantage of the Cubs’ power-arm Achilles heel. And the Cubs have too few good bullpen arms.

Of course, you should never blame a manager for the fault of the pieces he had left on the board, but Maddon made more than a few characteristic mistakes that did nothing to counter Cubs deficiencies and blunt Milwaukee’s advantages. Here they are:

1. Lifting Quintana early

It’s a broken record to say Maddon removes starters way too early in playoff games without a sensible plan for getting remaining outs. Prominent on this list were Games 6 and 7 in the 2016 World Series and Game 5 of the 2017 NLDS against the Nationals. Now add Game 163, with Maddon lifting Jose Quintana in a 1-1 tie after a mere 64 pitches.

One can argue Quintana gave up consistent hard contact and pitched only one clean inning. Yes, he gave up six hits, but he had no walks and pitched out of all but one situation. Plus, given the thinness of the bullpen and 12 outs left to get, getting more out of Quintana seemed imperative. Especially considering how well Chacin was pitching and the three-headed Knebel-Hader-Jeffress monster looming.

Maddon is wont to point to the sabermetrics about starters facing a lineup a third time through. However, this rationale doesn’t apply here. Maddon let Quintana face the Brewers’ two best hitters (Lorenzo Cain and Christian Yelich) three times, but not the rest of the lineup that featured just one hitter with better than a .240 career average against Quintana (Mike Moustakas – .261). If you are going to use the third-time-through rationale, you ought to be a purist and avoid the top two hitters – including Yelich who was already 2 for 2 against him.

I love that Jesse Chavez relieved Quintana and pitched two perfect innings. In fact, he needed only 16 pitches to do so, which somewhat recommended keeping him in for at least one more inning. He now has a 0.00 ERA in his last 10 appearances dating back to September 5, allowing only one inherited runner to score.

But knowing how sketchy and thin the rest of the bullpen is, the Cubs really needed the two innings Chavez did throw to come later than the 6th and 7th. This would be only possible by sticking with Quintana longer and hope the Cubs hitters break the 1-1 tie in regulation.

2. Pitching Steve Cishek three days in a row.

This is not a knock on Cishek. The dude’s arm has been clearly exhausted since the end of August. So no surprise his command was not sharp in his 80th appearance of the year. Throw in that he had pitched in back-to-back games, it was triply stunning Maddon went into Game 163 planning (according to his post-game comments) to pitch Cishek a third day in a row.

Ten days ago, I wrote that a key to Maddon managing his current bullpen resources in the playoffs required largely shutting Cishek down. I recommended pitching Cishek just a couple more times for maintenance purposes, and otherwise let his arm recharge and find a few more bullets for playoff appearances. Instead, Maddon pitched Cishek in seven of the Cubs’ last 10 games with very predictable results. Although no runs were charged to his ERA, Cishek allowed five of seven inherited runners to score, including one Monday.

A review of Cishek’s most recent appearances included Maddon using him to pitch the final inning of a 5-run Cubs win over the White Sox, with a four-run lead against the Pirates and – most unforgivably Sunday – with the Cubs up six on the Cardinals with Game 163 staring you in the face.

Worst of all, Maddon suggested in his post-game remarks that Cishek will be available for the Wild Card game – a fourth day in a row. His reasoning is they’ve “limited” their use of Cishek to just “jab with him [in short bursts] rather than pitch him a whole inning.”

But of course, the reason you can only use Cishek for an ineffective one- to two-hitter “burst” is because Maddon overused a premium set-up reliever and turned him into a mid-game Justin Wilson-style matchup pitcher.

3. Whither Terrance Gore?

For the second time in three games, the Cubs got their leadoff hitter on base in the 6th inning. Daniel Murphy got a hit Saturday down 2-1 to the Cardinals. Monday, it was Ian Happ with a walk in a 1-1 tie. Given that runs were hard to come by, both situations seemed prime for pinch-running Terrance Gore to change the lethargic offensive dynamic.

Murphy’s hit came ahead of Ben Zobrist and his excellent bat-control skills with no outs. Get a steal (never guaranteed) and perhaps Zobrist scores him or at least advances him to third for one chance at a sacrifice fly with Anthony Rizzo following Zobrist.

In Game 163, a Gore steal could have prevented the double play that Willson Contreras grounded into ahead of the top of the order. As it turned out, Murphy and Zobrist mounted a two-out rally with a single and a walk ahead of a Javy Baez whiff.

And even if Gore doesn’t attempt a steal, his mere presence is distracting and moves fielders out of their preferred positioning to guard against him running. It should be a managerial sin to ever end a close game with Gore on the bench – akin to Buck Showalter not pitching Zach Britton in a close 2016 Wild Card game.


One must always guard against “outcome bias.” All three alternate moves recommended above are based not on outcomes, but on pretty clear chances to increase win probability. The bad taste in the mouth left by the Game 163 defeat just makes Maddon’s poor moves all the more clear.

Of course, we’ve seen this poor playoff style from Maddon many times before. It nearly cost the Cubs the World Series title. One just hopes the front office can intervene and marshal all of its analytics force to encourage Maddon to correct his ways.

I’ll certainly be crossing my fingers, but not holding my breath.


Jeff Burdick

A California-based refugee of Chicago, Jeff loves writing about baseball through the lens of his favorite hometown team.

Related Articles


  1. Absolutely right about both the early hook for Q and the failure to use Gore in the 6th. Many of us said at the time, first-guessing, not second-guessing, that Q should stay in and that Gore should have run for Happ. Of course, the Cubs did have ONE hit already there in the 6th, and Contreras HAS been on fire…

    1. Thanks for the read and thoughtful comment! Here’s another way to think of the choice to pull Quintana. By bringing in Chavez so early, it basically became do you think Quintana is a better pitcher at 64 pitches than a fresh Wilson (who blew a save and win in his last appearance) and an exhausted Cishek (who has allowed 5 of his last 7 inherited runners to score)? I go with Quintana without hesitation.

      It’s also strange to invest so much of the payroll in starting pitchers when Maddon regularly lifts them so early in the playoffs. That’s a misinvestment of budget resources, But here’s hoping the offense delivers tonight to avoid difficult bullpen choices.

  2. All great points but three hits won’t beat anybody. I agree on points one and three however and I firmly believe that Maddon’s dedication to 18 outs only from his starters has taxed(and caused injury) to his bullpen.

    As far as Cishek – he’s toast right now but in fairness he was put into an incredibly difficult position and should not be faulted. Like you said – he’s been abused physically by Maddon all year- but not many pitchers would have escaped that situation unscathed. TBH I was more worried about a passed ball or wild pitch in that inning.

    If the Cubs go down tonight it will be interesting to hear the assessment of game management from the front office. They were “company line” when a possible extension was brought up, and they’ll be cryptic at season’s end but some things will be obvious.

    Bottom line – if the Cubs are only going to allow starters to go through a batting order twice then they are going to have to develop relievers with devastating stuff like the Brewers have. Only Edwards comes close as far as pure stuff, but he’s a head case.

    As far as Gore, the Cubs as a team have stopped stealing bases since mid-July. That’s on Maddon too. He manages “not to lose” games rather than to win them.

    I still think the Cubs win tonight however, and I believe they’ll be league champions.

  3. Can’t disagree with any of the 3, and 1 and 2 seem directly related (i.e. if you keep Q in for another 1-2 innings – perhaps you can avoid using Cishek). I too would have liked to see Gore amp up the pressure (that’s the only reason he’s on the roster) – but I can also see perhaps not wanting to burn that asset too early. That being said, the way this offense has been – they need to take shots when they get them, for fear that there won’t be more real shots in the later innings.

  4. Joe has to go, trade him to angels along with Russell, schwarbs, and almora for trout lol, but seriously he’s gotta go, why give opportunity to turn it around then leave? I can’t imagine extending him? If rumors of front/ joe rift tonight’s loss is perfect situation to cut bait and move on, dero or rossy, girardi is not analytics guy. Front office has some tough decisions to make

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button